Figurative Language in Verbal Communication Literature review

Figurative Language in Verbal Communication - Literature review ensampleIt is evidently clear from the discussion that gaining knowledge of the function of metaphoric language in effective confabulation necessitates an understanding of the interpersonal processes of everyday interaction. Individuals express themselves analogically for purposes of civility, to escape liability for the introduction of what is conveyed, to articulate insights that are hard to communicate employing exact language, and to articulate ideas in a dense and vibrant way (Jacques 2006). Hence, figurative language is employed to articulate and induce emotions in numerous forms of conversational contexts. Politics is an excellent knowledge domain to view how figurative language may be used particularly to induce specific emotions (Jacques 2006), which may consequently affect an case-by-cases perception of several issues. Politicians are prominent, or controversial, for their application of figurative lang uage to stir up emotions. Take for instance the deliberation that occurred in 1991 in the U.S. Senate over whether the terra firma should intervene militarily against Iraq for its attack on Kuwait (Sadri & Flammia 2011). Figurative language was extensively exercised by the Democrats and the republican to strengthen their arguments. For example, a Republican senator attempted to stir up the publics emotional reply to Hussein by portraying him in dramatic figurative expressions (Sadri & Flammia 2011 156) Saddam Hussein is like a gluttona geopolitical glutton. He is sitting down at a big spread head table, overflowing with goodies. And let me tell youlike every glutton, he is going to have them all. Kuwait is entirely the appetizer. He is gobbling it upbut it is not going to satisfy him. After a noisy belching or two, he is going to reach across the table for the next morsel. What is it going to be? Saudi Arabia? He is going to keep grabbing and gobbling. It is time to let this g risly glutton know the free eat is over. It is time for him to pay the bill. Hence, this paper argues that figurative language can communicate understated indications of meaning in a manner that exact language cannot. Specifically, various figurative terms strongly express an individuals figurative idea of the emotional encounter. Various empirical and linguistic scholars substantiate this assumption (Walch print 2007). Moreover, according to Jacques (2006), one indication of meaning that metaphorical language may convey is the extent of emotion. In everyday life, individuals do not merely reveal emotional encounters with partners, friends, and family members, but these emotional encounters may plant these family members and close friends in varied ways. Due to this, emotional communication is prone to be moderated by issues of saying management and by standards of self-recognition of emotions (Walch Publishing 2007). A number of studies have reported findings consistent with th e assumption that expression management issues and social standards influence emotional communication.